Furniture brands sometimes assume the Digital Product Passport is a problem for electronics and batteries. The first ESPR working plan (April 2025) says otherwise: furniture — with mattresses explicitly named — sits alongside textiles and tyres as a priority final-product group. There is no delegated act scheduled yet, so no fixed deadline. But when the act lands, obligations typically follow about 18 months later — a short runway for a sector whose product data lives scattered across foam suppliers, timber mills and contract factories.
The Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation — Regulation (EU) 2024/1781, in force since July 2024 — does not impose one go-live date. Instead, DPP obligations arrive product group by product group through delegated acts. The first working plan, published in April 2025, sets the priority list: textiles (apparel), furniture — including mattresses — and tyres among final products, plus iron & steel and aluminium as intermediates.
For furniture there is no delegated act scheduled yet. The first act is expected around 2026 for iron & steel, with textiles indicatively following in 2027; furniture sits in the same priority wave without a published date. What is predictable is the mechanism: once a furniture delegated act enters into force, company obligations typically apply roughly 18 months later. Eighteen months sounds generous until you set it against furniture development and sourcing cycles — a range designed today may still be on sale when the rules bite.
The exact field list will be fixed by the delegated act, but the ESPR framework and the working plan point clearly at the themes:
There is a practical overlap here: several member states already run extended producer responsibility (EPR) schemes for furniture and mattresses. Much of the data those schemes ask for — materials, weights, recyclability — is the same data a DPP will structure. Work done once, properly, serves both.
Furniture supply chains make responsibility easy to misjudge. If you sell furniture under your own brand but a third-party factory builds it, EU product law generally treats you as the manufacturer — the passport and its accuracy are yours. If you import finished furniture from outside the EU, you are the importer placing it on the market, and ensuring a compliant passport exists lands on you, not on the overseas factory. Retailers with private-label ranges are caught on both counts.
The uncomfortable part: the evidence you will need — foam chemistry declarations, timber origin, test reports — sits with suppliers who have no EU obligation of their own. Getting contractual data commitments in place before a deadline exists is far easier than negotiating them under one.
The rational strategy for a sector with a named priority but no dated obligation is not to wait — it is to make the delegated act boring when it arrives. That means auditing what product data you actually hold, closing supplier gaps while relationships are calm, and structuring the evidence so a passport becomes an output, not a project.
This is where PassPer starts: our AI reads the documents you and your suppliers already have — spec sheets, certificates, supplier declarations — and structures them into passport-ready data with human review, so the day the furniture field list is published you are mapping fields, not hunting paperwork. Begin with the free readiness check to see where your gaps are.
Take the 2-minute readiness check, watch the 10-minute interactive walkthrough, or download the full 2026 compliance guide. No account needed.