The Critical Raw Materials Act — Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 — and the battery passport requirement in Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 are separate legal instruments with different mechanisms. But they are pointed at the same materials: lithium, cobalt, nickel, graphite and rare earths. If you are already assembling material declarations, recycled content figures and due-diligence evidence for a battery passport, you are building most of the dataset that the EU's raw-materials agenda runs on.
Last updated:
Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 establishes a framework for securing the EU's supply of strategic and critical raw materials. Its concerns are supply resilience — reducing dependency on concentrated sources — alongside monitoring of supply chains and risks, and strengthening circularity so that materials already inside the EU economy are recovered and reused rather than lost.
Batteries sit at the centre of that picture because they concentrate exactly the materials the framework is about. An EV battery is, from a raw-materials perspective, a dense and traceable store of lithium, cobalt, nickel and graphite that will one day need to be recovered. That is why raw-materials policy and battery policy keep converging even though they arrive through different legal doors.
The battery passport requires roughly 110 data points from 18 February 2027, and several of its families are raw-materials data by any other name:
Note the direction of the relationship carefully: the CRMA does not create battery passport obligations. Your passport duty comes from Regulation (EU) 2023/1542. What the two instruments share is an appetite for the same evidence, from the same suppliers, about the same materials.
Most manufacturers discover raw-materials data the hard way: a customer sustainability questionnaire, then a battery passport project, then a procurement request about supply risk — each handled separately, each re-asking the same cell supplier the same questions in a slightly different format, each producing a spreadsheet that ages immediately.
The cost of that is not the paperwork. It is that three inconsistent answers now exist about the same battery, and you cannot tell which is right. A single structured material dataset — one authoritative record of composition, origin, recycled content and due-diligence evidence per battery model — is cheaper to maintain and defensible when someone checks. The battery passport gives you a good reason to build it, because that one is legally dated.
PassPer builds this from documents you already have — spec sheets, certificates and supplier declarations — using AI extraction with human review, then publishes it as a registered, eIDAS-seal-ready battery passport. See how supplier data collection works, or run a free readiness check.
Count down to 18 February 2027 and work backwards to when each step has to start for your SKU count.
Take the 2-minute readiness check, watch the 10-minute interactive walkthrough, or download the full 2026 compliance guide. No account needed.